The Trump administration's decision to withdraw 2,000 National Guards from Los Angeles stirred public reaction. This move was seen as a sign of ending the government’s active response to protests following George Floyd's death. The protests, triggered by systemic racism and police brutality, began in May 2020 and included both peaceful demonstrations and unrest. The presence of guards was viewed both as stabilizing and as a threat to civil liberties. According to the White House, their role was to maintain order and protect federal property. However, critics argued that the prolonged military presence fueled tensions rather than calming them. Some communities demanded continued security forces until stability was restored. The withdrawal coincided with increased ICE immigration raids, prompting concerns over resource reallocation. Human rights groups criticized the shift in priorities away from reforms. Politically, the move was seen as Trump seeking to show strength without appearing to militarize cities ahead of the 2020 election. For many, it symbolized double standards – suppressing protests but ignoring police abuse. The situation in LA illustrated the fragile balance between security and civil rights. Withdrawal did not stop protests but amplified calls for police and justice reform. It was another chapter in America’s politically charged climate, blurring the lines between order and oppression. Sources: https://apnews.com/article/1c3c74d8a59aeb0cfeb5ef897e7a5c16 https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/07/us/national-guard-los-angeles.html https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/06/trump-national-guard-george-floyd-protests https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/06/politics/national-guard-la-george-floyd/index.html